Environmental Values 25 (2016): 353-370. doi: 10.3197/096327116X14598445991547
Download reference in Endnote or BibTex format
Most philosophers and psychologists who have explored the psychology of climate change have focused only on motivational issues - getting people to act on what morality requires of them. This is misleading, however, because there are other psychological processes directed not at motivation but rather our ability to grasp the implications of climate change in a general way - what Stephen Gardiner has called the 'grasping problem'. Taking the grasping problem as my departure point, I draw two conclusions from the relevant psychological literature: 1) ethicists and policy makers should focus less on changing individuals' behaviours and more on changing policy; and 2) although solutions to climate change must come at the level of policy, progress on this front will be limited by incompatible moral norms.
Climate change, psychological limitations, psychological constraints, Stephen Gardiner, Jonathan Haidt.
REFERENCES to other articles in Environmental Values:
Wrongful Harm to Future Generations: The Case of Climate Change.Marc D. Davidson
CITATIONS in other Environmental Values articles
Social Ecological Transformation and the Individual. Clive L. Spash
Subscriptions and back numbers of Environmental Values.Other papers in this volume
THE WHITE HORSE PRESS
The Old Vicarage, Winwick
Cambridgeshire, PE28 5PN, UK
Tel: +44 1832 293222